A structured look at borrower-submitted reviews on Google Play, Trustpilot, and consumer-complaint forums for mPokket, RamFinCorp, PayRupik and LendingPlate — what they reveal, the RBI rules that apply, and what borrowers can do if they recognise these patterns.
Author: SahiSujhav Editorial Desk First published: May 21, 2026 · Last updated: May 21, 2026 Reading time: ~9 minutes Sources: All claims hyperlinked inline. Primary sources: Google Play Store, Trustpilot, Consumer Complaints Court India, RBI Master Direction on Digital Lending (September 2022).
In a sentence
A review of publicly available borrower feedback across four widely-downloaded instant loan apps in India shows recurring patterns — gaps between advertised and disbursed amounts, short tenures with high effective interest rates, and recovery practices that borrowers have described as falling outside the conduct standards set by the Reserve Bank of India's Fair Practices Code.
About this article. SahiSujhav is an independent borrower-side information platform. We do not lend, broker loans, or accept referral commissions from any lender mentioned. We have summarised publicly available reviews from official platforms; we have not added editorial characterisation beyond what reviewers themselves have written. Every named entity has been invited to provide a response in writing — see Right of Reply at the end of this article.
Why we wrote this
In FY 2023, Indian fintech and digital lending firms sanctioned ~10.19 crore loans totalling ₹1,46,517 crore — a 49% year-on-year increase in value, according to Grant Thornton's industry analysis. Most digital borrowers research apps using two signals: the App Store rating, and a quick Google search.
But the headline star rating often masks the substance of the recent one-star reviews. A 4.1 average can sit on top of a body of recent feedback describing distress that would change a borrower's mind if they read it before they downloaded.
This article does not assert that any of the named apps are operating outside Indian law. It compiles and summarises what borrowers themselves have written, identifies the patterns those reviews describe, and points readers to the RBI rules that apply if such patterns are accurate. Borrowers are then linked to the official remedies available to them.
Methodology
For each of the four apps below, we collected one-star and two-star reviews published between January 2024 and May 2026 across three public sources:
- Google Play Store — official user reviews
- Trustpilot — verified user reviews
- Consumer Complaints Court (India) — formal user complaints filed online
We selected representative quotes that illustrate a recurring pattern across multiple users. We have not contacted individual reviewers or verified their identity beyond what the source platforms display. We have invited each named app to provide a written response (see Right of Reply).
Direct quotes are reproduced as published, with minor formatting only. Our full review process is documented in our editorial methodology.
App 1: mPokket
Category: Instant short-term personal loans, primarily for students and salaried users Reported lender: mPokket Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. (listed on Google Play as registered with RBI) Public Play Store rating at time of writing: 4.1 average
What recent reviewers have written
On the Google Play Store listing, one user wrote:
"The app's customer support is so irritating. When I said I don't want a loan they kept calling, then I completed profile verification… But when I don't need a loan now, they are still calling me every 10 minutes."
A second Play Store reviewer described a server-side repayment failure:
"I took a ₹5,000 loan and tried to repay on the due date, but the app had server issues and the payment could not be completed."
A user on Consumer Complaints Court wrote, in a formal complaint:
"I am willing to pay only the original amount of ₹20,000, but they insist on the higher amount of ₹40,000. They are constantly harassing my parents and me to pay the full ₹40,000."
A formal complaint filed on Consumer Complaints India describes repeated outbound calls:
"Repeated and harassing phone calls being made to my family and friends. These calls are frequent — up to 100 times in a single day."
A third-party industry overview by Kimola summarising Play Store reviews observed that users "appreciate emergency loan availability but face challenges with repayments, late charges, and loan visibility… technical glitches… delayed responses."
What the RBI rules say
If the pattern described above is accurate, several provisions in the RBI Fair Practices Code and the RBI Master Direction on Digital Lending (September 2022) would be relevant:
- Recovery agents must operate only between 8:00 AM and 7:00 PM.
- Recovery calls and visits must not amount to harassment.
- Lenders must not contact a borrower's family, friends, or employer for the purpose of recovery.
- Digital lending apps must disclose all fees and interest in a Key Fact Statement (KFS) before disbursal.
mPokket lists a public grievance email of support@mpokket.com and a customer-care line of +91 33 6645 2400.
App 2: RamFinCorp
Category: Short-tenure personal loans for salaried users Reported lender: R. K. Bansal Finance Pvt. Ltd, described in third-party reviews as an RBI-registered NBFC Public Trustpilot rating at time of writing: 2.5 average across ~104 reviews
What recent reviewers have written
A Trustpilot reviewer published in July 2025 described:
"I took a loan of ₹7,000. They disbursed ₹6,124. Repayment with interest is ₹9,130 in 18 days, while applying for loan they showed me to pay only ₹8,130."
A second Trustpilot reviewer wrote about recovery contact frequency:
"Daily calling and harassing… every day 100 calls will come. Daily harassing and threatening."
A third Trustpilot reviewer summarised:
"All 6 EMIs paid on time. Still showing 5 late payments. My CIBIL points down by 150 points."
A formal complaint published on Consumer Complaints Court read:
"35 calls a day and 25 or more messages. Proofs attached herewith of loan sanction letter."
A third-party review summarising the pattern across multiple users (Earning Review, May 2025) wrote that "Users report interest rates as high as 35% per month, significantly above industry standards (Trustpilot). Multiple reports of aggressive collection tactics, including daily calls (up to 35) and threatening messages."
The math, on the user-described example above
A loan disbursed at ₹6,124 with repayment of ₹9,130 in 18 days, if accurate as reported by the user, would imply an effective Annual Percentage Rate (APR) in the range of several hundred percent when annualised on the cashflow series.
The exact APR depends on the precise structure of fees and interest as defined in the user's Key Fact Statement. Borrowers can compute their own true APR for any loan using the SahiSujhav EMI Truth Calculator, which applies the standard Newton-Raphson IRR method on the actual cashflow series.
What the RBI rules say
Under the RBI Master Direction on Digital Lending (2022), lenders must provide a Key Fact Statement (KFS) to the borrower before disbursal, disclosing:
- The Annual Percentage Rate (APR), inclusive of all fees and charges
- The full repayment schedule
- The total cost of the loan
- The recovery mechanism in case of default
Significant divergence between the figures shown in the application and the figures payable post-disbursal, if a borrower's account is accurate, would warrant filing a complaint with the lender's grievance officer, escalating to the RBI Sachet portal, and lodging a parallel complaint with the National Consumer Helpline (1915).
App 3: PayRupik
Category: Short-tenure personal loans Reported lender: Sayyam Investments Pvt. Ltd., described in third-party reviews as an NBFC-registered entity Public Play Store rating at time of writing: ~4.2 average
What recent reviewers have written
A Trustpilot reviewer wrote:
"Took loan for ₹27,000. They charged some post fee, GST, etc. And the money received was ₹23,000 and including all taxes and charges it comes to ₹27,900."
A Play Store reviewer cited in a third-party analysis (Rupeeriser, Sept 2025) wrote:
"Scam alert. Hid instalment details until after approval. High interest — much higher than market."
A Quora user cited in the same analysis wrote:
"Borrowed ₹5,000 in crisis. Calls to family started before due date."
A formal complaint on Consumer Complaints Court is particularly notable because it describes recovery contact without a corresponding loan:
"I have not taken any loan, yet I am being harassed by sending messages and calling. The name of the company is Payrupik."
Multiple complaints on the same forum echo this pattern of users receiving recovery contact for loans they say they did not take. This pattern — whether attributable to data leaks, mistaken identity, or organised fraud — has been documented by Deccan Herald in January 2025 in the context of broader loan-app abuse cases.
What the RBI rules say
The RBI Master Direction explicitly requires that:
- Loan disbursal be transparent and traceable to a regulated entity
- Borrowers be issued a digitally signed Key Fact Statement before any debit
- Recovery action be initiated only against a verified, documented borrower
If a person who never applied for a loan is receiving recovery contact, that is a separate and serious issue: it may involve identity theft (BNS §319, IT Act §66C) and warrants both a cyber crime complaint at cybercrime.gov.in and a complaint to the platform's grievance officer.
App 4: LendingPlate
Category: Short-tenure personal loans Public listing: lendingplate.com
What recent reviewers have written
Consumer Complaints Court carries multiple complaints filed between January and December 2025. A representative selection:
"I have paid 1 EMI and still 2 EMIs pending. I lost my job. I am in notice period, I can't pay right now. They are calling and harassing my contacts."
"I lost my job since Feb 2025. I told them. Daily harassment with abusive language. I have all call records. Already emailed care team on 26 June 2025 and 21 July 2025 but yet no response."
"Continues abusing and harassing me and my family using bad language all the time. I have some major medical urgency. He ignored my situation and continuously called my office senior. If I lose my job, then…"
A separate complaint on the same forum (December 2025) describes recovery contact reaching a user's contact list:
"They calling them, asking about paying money forcefully. They calling again and again continuously."
What LendingPlate itself states
LendingPlate's own policies page states, regarding recovery:
"In the matter of recovery of loans, the Company shall not resort to undue harassment…"
We have reproduced this statement verbatim from their public policy page. We have invited LendingPlate to comment on the gap between this stated policy and the experiences described by users on public complaint forums.
What the RBI rules say
The pattern described in user complaints — contact with family members and colleagues, calls described by users as abusive, and reported difficulty reaching the company's grievance team — would, if accurate, run contrary to the Fair Practices Code. The standard remedies (lender grievance officer → RBI Sachet → consumer court / cyber crime complaint where threats are involved) apply. See our harassment toolkit for the full step-by-step.
Patterns observed across the four apps
We are presenting these as patterns described by reviewers — not as findings of wrongdoing by any specific lender.
| Pattern reviewers described | RBI rule that applies if accurate |
|---|---|
| Gap between advertised and disbursed amount after fees | RBI Master Direction on Digital Lending (2022) — full KFS disclosure before disbursal |
| Short repayment tenure with high effective APR | KFS must disclose APR inclusive of all charges |
| Recovery calls to borrower's contacts, family or employer | Fair Practices Code for NBFCs |
| Recovery calls outside 8 AM – 7 PM | Fair Practices Code, Section on collection conduct |
| Recovery contact for loans the recipient says they did not take | Identity theft (BNS §319, IT Act §66C) if a third party originated the loan |
| Difficulty reaching grievance officer | RBI Digital Lending Guidelines mandate a named grievance officer with defined response SLA |
| Frequency of calls described as excessive (multiple per day) | Fair Practices Code — recovery action must not amount to harassment |
We do not claim any of the four apps named here have violated these rules. We are summarising patterns described in public reviews, and naming the rules that would apply if the user accounts are accurate.
What a borrower can do if they recognise these patterns
If you are a borrower currently experiencing any of these patterns — whether with one of the apps named above or another — here is the standard escalation path. Our harassment toolkit has the full templates and scripts.
1. Document everything
- Screenshot every message
- Record every call (legal in India when you are a party to the call)
- Save the loan agreement, KFS, and disbursal statement
- Note dates, times, agent names, and phone numbers used
2. Lender's grievance officer (first step, mandatory)
Under RBI Digital Lending Guidelines, every regulated lender must have a named grievance officer with a published email and a defined response window. File a written complaint here first. Keep proof.
3. RBI Sachet Portal
File at sachet.rbi.org.in. This is the RBI's official complaint mechanism for unregulated and regulated entities. It is free and takes 10–15 minutes.
4. National Consumer Helpline
Dial 1915 or file online at consumerhelpline.gov.in. Best for unfair charges, hidden fees, and disclosure violations.
5. National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal
File at cybercrime.gov.in or call 1930. This is the right channel if threats, morphed images, intimidation, or contact-list harassment is involved. Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Section 351 (criminal intimidation) and Section 356 (defamation), and the IT Act Section 66E (violation of privacy), apply.
6. Consult a lawyer
For organised harassment or significant financial dispute, a registered advocate can issue a legal notice and escalate. SahiSujhav does not provide legal advice and is not a substitute for one.
7. If you are in emotional distress
iCall: 9152987821 (Mon–Sat, 8 AM – 10 PM, free, confidential, multiple languages) Vandrevala Foundation: 1860 2662 345 (24/7) No loan is worth your safety.
Frequently asked questions
Are the apps named in this article illegal?
We have not made that claim. All four apps were operating on the Google Play Store at the time of writing and have public listings, customer-care contacts, and stated affiliations with NBFC entities. What we have done is summarise public user reviews and identify the patterns those reviews describe. Determinations of legality rest with the RBI, the relevant Consumer Court, and the judiciary.
How do I check if a loan app is RBI-registered?
The Reserve Bank of India publishes a list of registered NBFCs at rbi.org.in. An app being marketed by an entity that is not RBI-registered is a serious red flag.
What is an APR and why does it matter more than the advertised "interest rate"?
APR (Annual Percentage Rate) is the total cost of credit per year, inclusive of all fees, charges, and interest. A loan that advertises "₹500 fees on ₹10,000" can carry an APR over 100% when the short tenure and other charges are factored in. The RBI mandates APR disclosure in the Key Fact Statement before disbursal. Borrowers can compute APR for any loan independently using the SahiSujhav EMI Truth Calculator.
Where can I find more reviews?
Google Play Store and Trustpilot are official platforms with verified reviews. Consumer Complaints Court India (consumercomplaintscourt.com) and the National Consumer Helpline (consumerhelpline.gov.in) carry filed user complaints.
Does SahiSujhav rate or recommend lenders?
SahiSujhav publishes reviews of digital lending apps based on Key Fact Statement analysis, RBI registration status, and patterns observed in public user complaints. We do not accept referral commissions, paid placement, or any compensation from any lender. Our methodology is published at /transparency.
Right of Reply
We have invited each of mPokket, RamFinCorp, PayRupik, and LendingPlate to provide a written response to the patterns described in this article. Responses will be appended to this article verbatim within reasonable length limits. Lenders can write to: hello@sahisujhav.in.
We will update this article promptly to reflect:
- Any factual correction supported by documentation
- Any company response or clarification
- Material changes in user-review patterns
Last review of public reviews referenced in this article: May 19, 2026.
About this article
Editorial methodology: /methodology
Disclosures: /disclosures — SahiSujhav is not a lender, does not broker loans, and does not accept referral commissions from any lender mentioned in this article.
Privacy: /privacy
Corrections policy: hello@sahisujhav.in